For example only 25% which is far from 80% and 100% and this is only for full render (no smart render) concatenate HD-clips (1920x1080i50) to the same format with no filters, no transition effects, no supplementary other tracks (title, audio.). Pinnacle comes with a learning curve as most other editors that come from a pro background and are designed for the enthusiast/prosumer.įor me: slow rendering means that the CPU-load stays far away from 100% and there is no other bottleneck in the system (drive, memory, etc.). But if speed is at the top of your list, then Pinnacle would be the way to go. The one you started with, the types of programs you used in the past, and how easy it is to use. Granted, personal preference plays a role in which program you prefer. Those apps add motion-tracking, 360-degree VR support and, most importantly, greater ease of use.".
Again PCMag in Vegas 14 review "But the program still has more to do to catch up with our consumer video editing software Editors' Choices, Cyberlink PowerDirector and Corel VideoStudio. Ease of use and accessibility, along with features are also important. Rendering is an important aspect of video editing, but not the only aspect. On the other hand, CyberLink PowerDirector took only 2:34 and Pinnacle Studio, the current rendering speed champ, took just 1:56." It beat out Adobe Premiere Elements' 5:18 and Corel VideoStudio's 4 minutes and 55 seconds. This is an acceptable middle-of-the-pack result.
#Faster rendering in autopano video more cores cuda movie#
"The test movie (whose duration is just under 5 minutes) took Vegas Movie Studio 14 minutes to render without hardware acceleration configured, but only 3 minutes and 20 seconds with GPU rendering correctly configured.
Well, I don't like being the someone that brings not so good news, but CVS has never been a rendering leader.įrom the review of Vegas Movie 14 at PCMag.
0 kommentar(er)
